![]()
|
||||||
|
©
2001 Comments
to |
It's
all about power
One of our favorite and most
frustrating pundits, Molly Ivins, is nearly illiterate when it comes to
economics. So are many liberals. They waste arrows on the wrong targets,
they fight the wrong battles.
In her column this week, (on this page), Ms. Ivins takes aim at free
markets. As an example, she uses airline deregulation to show how bad
deregulation can be.
Then she defeats her own case. Airline travel has tripled in 20 years,
she points out, and fares are 40 percent lower.
She implies we need more regulation, without saying what that would be.
True, this would probably solve many of the industry's problems, but do
so by driving up the cost of airfares and making air travel again the
reserve of the wealthy and business class.
That's an interesting position for one who champions the less advantaged.
Even more perplexing is her position on the trucking industry. She talks
about sweat shops on wheels, but gives short shrift to the fact that lower
transportation costs reduce the cost of food. This can be a good thing
for poor people.
Free markets also offer choice. Choice is a cornerstone of liberty.
Ivins makes the common mistake of confusing markets with monopolies.
Markets can be, and often are, manipulated by powerful interests who own
our government. These are the "Skull and Boners" who operate not in a
free market but in clubs and conference rooms and golf courses, the (mostly)
guys who know they will win the game because they write the rules.
Deceit, collusion and corruption -- not markets -- are the enemy of the
people.
It is true that markets are soulless mechanisms for the exchange of goods
and do not recognize morality, social goals or evils. But a truly free
market can also reduce costs, lower poverty, make more goods and services
available to more people with lower incomes than any other mechanism.
There is a place for regulation. Industries require oversight. Safety
regulations need to be enacted and enforced. Most importantly, monopoly
and collusion need to be prevented.
But this won't happen, because liberals don't understand economics and
politicians are owned by those who do.
E.D.
|
|
||||