![]()
|
|||||||
|
©
2001 |
Board
approves high school schematic design
After sending architects back
to the drawing board over the past two months to come up with a smaller,
less-expensive school design, the school board finally approved a schematic
design for a 147,500-square-foot school on Monday, November 19.
The design cost is estimated
at $20,874,000 -- under the budget set earlier this month of $21 million.
The design includes a 920-seat
auditorium (see related story, page 1). Architects trimmed out about 8,000
square feet by shrinking hallways and the size of the commons.
The design also eliminates
some locker room space, and some athletic and parking facilities.
The schematic design phase
of the project stretched from a projected three months to over five months
and required redrawing of plans.
The architects, Scott Steele
Associates, asked for and received payment for $7,622 for extra work entailed
in the redesign of the project.
Additional redesign fees will
be requested for the month of November.
Those fees stopped with Monday's
decision to accept the schematic design.
The architects will now move
on to the detailed design phase.
The board also decided to
pursue an alternative contracting method for the project in an effort
to save money and possibly open the school earlier. The "Construction
Manager/General Contractor" (CMGC) arrangement brings a contractor onboard
early, so that the builder can offer alternatives in design, materials
and construction techniques that could save substantial costs.
"I think there's some real
cost savings and probably some better quality by going this route," said
board member Steve Keeton, who is a professional contractor.
The board agreed to include
a clause in the CMGC agreement allowing the district to sever the contract
if the City of Sisters vote to annex the school property fails in March.
That way, the district would not incur extra costs while pursuing annexation
alternatives.
The specter of a "no" vote
on annexation has loomed increasingly large over the board's deliberations.
Sisters resident Mel Bryan raised the possibility that discontented voters,
worried about the economy, could turn the district down.
He urged the board to reconsider
high school plans.
Board chair Heather Wester
questioned Bryan as to what good could come of a "no" vote, since the
bonds are sold and taxes have been levied.
"It would mess us up," she
said, forcing the district to drill water wells and use septic tanks instead
of city services. But a school will still be built.
"Our school would be smaller
and look uglier," she said.
Voters within the city limits
of Sisters favored the bond for the new high school in the March election
by a margin of a couple of percentage points, according to schools superintendent
Steve Swisher.
|
|
|||||