![]()
|
|||||||
|
©
2001 |
Letters,
letters, letters
To the Editor:
In response to a letter to the editor, I am appalled at the statement
referring to "an ugly faction in the community" that takes issue with
the wasteful and unnecessary construction of a new high school.
It was further stated that, "I guess this is just part of being in a
small town where people feel they can speak up, even if it is after the
fact." This slanderous label of people who have a different viewpoint
is highly unprofessional and only serves to divide the community and bring
distrust upon those who are in official positions.
Speaking of "after the fact," may I remind the writer of the fact that
in November 2000 the voting public voted not to incur a bond assessment
for a new high school, demonstrating the concern that the current high
school was nowhere near capacity, particularly in light of current and
projected enrollment.
However, those in this city who demand to have their own way were not
content with this majority outcome and set about to hoodwink the voters
by pressing for another vote the following May. Through the manipulative
process of playing on the emotions of a "Vote for our Children" campaign,
the general apathy, and uninformed voting public, the bond issue passed.
The recent tax bills make it painfully clear that the price tag for this
mistake is upon us all.
So the question is what can be done about it now? Observation and suggestions
have been made by some, and rightly so, that we halt all further activity
regarding preliminary work on a new high school and concentrate on channeling
the bond money towards a much greater need for a new middle school.
This cost would be far less and much more in line with the educational
needs of the community. The result would be to significantly pay down
the bond and reduce the tax burden for everyone affected within the school
district.
A NO vote for annexation of the UGB area by the citizens of Sisters next
March would allow time for a common sense re-evaluation of future educational
needs and ultimate school construction.
Roy R. Schulke
* * *
To the Editor:
There really is a Santa Claus, but he didn't come down my chimney and
he didn't come in his sleigh with his eight tiny reindeer.
On that cold, wet and windy day, Thursday, December 13, in Central Oregon,
on Cloverdale Road, the wind was blowing so fierce and the rain was so
cold, it knocked over my mailbox, right out of the ground to my dismay.
Within the hour of finding it fallen over, I had gathered all the tools
to repair the fallen down mailbox -- I returned and lo and behold Santa
had already been there with his sleigh and eight tiny reindeer, with shovel
in hand and fixed my mailbox, putting it right back into the ground!
Thank you so very much for doing this for me, dear Santa, on that cold,
rainy windy day.
There really is a Santa Claus.
Janet Herring
* * *
To the Editor:
We appreciate so much the Christmas spirit displayed by Gary Lovegren
and the Sisters Fire Department in their light display. It's a treat to
drive by and take our grandkids.
The Conklin family
* * *
To the Editor:
An open letter to Chief Mark Kroeker; Portland Police Department:
Like you Chief Kroeker, I also wear (proudly) the uniform of law enforcement.
Unlike you, I have not, and would not, dishonor my badge and refuse to
interview those people that could possibly have clues to the murderers
of thousands of men, women and children in the September 11 attack on
America.
I feel, as well as my fellow officers, that you have dishonored the police
and firefighters that are still entombed in the rubble of the World Trade
Center.
Why don't you do the honorable thing and resign; I'm sure your new friends
at the ACLU and City of Berkeley, California, would welcome such a 'courageous'
man to join their little bands of do-gooders.
Richard John
|
|
|||||