![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Coach
protests length of spring break
A two-week spring break may be
nice for some families and kids in Sisters, but it's tough on the track
program at Sisters High School.
Track coach Bob Johnson took
issue with the long break before the Sisters School Board on Monday, April
1.
According to Johnson, it is
hard to keep his athletes in condition and it's even harder for them to
keep their edge in some of the technical events when they have a long
lay-off.
During the voluntary spring
break practices, only an average of 20 kids out of a 70-student program
turned out. Some were away on other school trips; some were on family
vacations.
Johnson doesn't begrudge them
time with family or in other activities.
"I tell them, family is number-one,"
Johnson said. "Family is number-one, grades are number-two and track is
number three."
However, Johnson does recognize
that a long layoff makes it hard for athletes to perform at their best.
That situation could be worse next year, when the two-week spring break
falls only a month before district finals.
That could put Johnson in
the position of forcing kids to make painful choices.
"My concern is that... I'm
going to have to make one week mandatory," Johnson said.
Johnson said that other districts
have seen ugly results from making practices mandatory. Many students
can't make practices and thus have to quit the team.
"Right now, we have a home
for a lot of kids that wouldn't be very good in other sports," Johnson
said. "I sure don't want to see those numbers go down."
Johnson's assistant coach,
Jim Anderson -- a former teacher -- questioned whether the long break
is good for students in other ways.
"It's hard for me to think
of an educational advantage for two weeks," he said.
Johnson repeatedly asked whether
the calendar for next year is "concrete," and he did not receive a definitive
answer. The calendar for next school year has been adopted.
The scheduled breaks are designed,
in part, to keep trimester terms at the same length to allow enough teaching
time each term.
School superintendent Steve
Swisher indicated that the current calendar could be modified by board
action, but the board gave no indication that it would consider doing
so.
Board chair Heather Wester
noted that the board had heard from Johnson and the parents of track team
members, but not from other groups.
"To say that we're going to
change it next year, just for you, for the track team, to me doesn't make
much sense," Wester said.
Swisher told Johnson that
the "skeleton" calendar for the following year is still open to change.
|
|
||||||