![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Land
swap proposed near Sisters
Legislation may be soon be introduced
in Congress that would allow a Sisters man to exchange 1,240 acres he owns
in the Steens Mountains for 690 acres bordered by Squaw Creek in Sisters.
George Stroemple bought the
Blair Ranch in the Steens in 2001, according to Paul Dewey, a lawyer in
Bend who is one of Stroemple's representatives in the exchange.
Dewey said the Blair parcels
in the Steens are "in the middle of a cow-free wilderness, and is amazing
habitat at 7,000 feet to 8,000 feet with a wild and scenic river as part
of it."
The Sisters parcel is approximately
three miles south of Sisters, adjacent to 50 acres Stroemple owns along
Squaw Creek and accessed by Three Creeks Road.
Sisters District Ranger Bill
Anthony said the land, with riparian and potential steehead habitat, "is
not land we would usually think of disposing of -- it is in an area of
the forest where we would generally try to retain or acquire more land."
Two environmental groups,
the Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) and the Oregon Natural Resources
Council (ONRC), -- reluctantly and with reservations -- support the exchange.
Dewey, an environmentalists
who lived for eight years along Squaw Creek and protected the area from
hydro projects and logging, said that advocating for this exchange "doesn't
mean I am for trading all of Squaw Creek land to private ownership.
"I am in favor of exchanges
when there is a net public benefit, and in this case where there are development
restrictions and a conservation easement protecting the creek," Dewey
said.
Those protections were also
of critical importance to Tim Lillebo of the ONRC and Bill Marlett of
ONDA.
They noted that the legislation
would prohibit commercial development on the Sisters land, explicitly
prohibiting golf courses or destinations resorts. Marlett said Stroemple
has told them he hopes to build one or two more homes for family members.
The 300 foot set-back of any
development from Squaw Creek was also an important consideration.
Marlett also thought Stroemple
would better manage the land than the Forest Service.
District Ranger Anthony agrees
that "we have been challenged (in managing the land)... there have been
a lot of parties, gun shooting and habitation along the creek.
"However, we don't believe
selling or exchanging is the solution. Retaining lands and getting the
resources to manage them is more appropriate, not trading out of them
when we have difficulties," said Anthony.
The district ranger said there
was support for the "goals of the Steens Mountain Area, (but) we feel
there are other lands that would be better suitable or in the public interest
for exchanges, other lands in or out of the Sisters Ranger District. Or
the government could procure (buy outright) lands in the Steens, as opposed
to trading out of lands (such as those in Sisters) we would try to retain."
Anthony also worried that
"we have worked with many groups to acquire land such as this, with instream
flow, for ecological and social reasons. This exchange might undermine
efforts to acquire such lands in the future."
Lillebo and Marlett agreed
that purchase outright of the Steens land would be better than an exchange.
However, Lillebo said Congressman
Greg Walden had impeded the use of more than $20 million that was authorized
for land purchase as part of the legislation that created the Steens Wilderness.
The Nature Conservancy was
interested in acquiring the Blair ranch but backed off when they learned
that they would not be reimbursed.
Marlett said that the Harney
County government has a policy of "no net loss" of private lands and particularly
opposes federal purchase.
Stroemple is not particularly
interested in acquiring lands other than those adjacent to his 50-acre
homesite in Sisters, acknowledged Dewey.
So, without the ability at
this time to purchase the Steens land outright, the environmental groups
are accepting the exchange, as long as there are protections for the Squaw
Creek property.
In addition to the development
restrictions, Lillebo said that it was very important to "maintain public
access on the east side of Squaw Creek (though he would like vehicles
kept back farther from the water's edge), and that ... we make sure that
the Steens (property) will go to cow free wilderness" when acquired by
the government.
Stroemple has also offered
$100,000 to the Secretary of Agriculture for fisheries habitat work on
Squaw Creek under management of Upper Deschutes Watershed Council, said
Dewey.
District Ranger Anthony said
that the forest service will give input on the exchange "when some elected
official sponsors legislation and the Forest Service is contacted to provide
information."
|
|
||||||