![]()
|
||||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Aesbestos
found after fire training exercise
A recent fire training exercise
in Sisters has raised concerns about environmental hazards.
Sisters firefighters intentionally
burned a house at 461 S. Elm Street on May 6. According to the Department
of Environmental Quality, there was aesbestos in the cement siding on
one wall of the small structure.
Asbestos fibers pose a cancer
risk if inhaled or ingested.
The Sisters-Camp Sherman Rural
Fire Protection District received certification in advance that all asbestos
had been removed from the structure, according to Assistant Fire Chief
Ken Enoch.
That is standard procedure
in all burn-to-learn scenarios.
"We have the homeowner furnish
us with documentation that all asbestos has been removed," Enoch said.
According to Frank Messina
of the Department of Environmental Quality, the property was surveyed
by Environmental Consulting and Investigation (ECI) of Bend, but the asbestos
in the siding was apparently missed.
John Head of ECI said "it
appears that the (aesbestos) siding was underneath other siding. There
were several different kinds of siding on that house."
The aesbestos siding was hidden
under the other layers, according to Head.
Since wood was visible in
patches underneath the outer siding,, Head said, "I didn't see a need
to rip off siding and look for other siding."
Head said an abatement team
was to go to Sisters on Tuesday to to removethe aesbestos, which has been
covered since it was found.
According to Messina, it is
impossible to tell what level of risk was created.
"The possibility of release
is always there when you carry out that kind of activity," Messina said.
"It posed a risk when it was burned like that."
However, Messina noted, the
heat of the fire turned the asbestos fibers to glass and the amount of
material was small.
The aesbestos board at the
site is stable "non-friable" material, according to Head.
The main danger from aesbestos
is when "friable" material flakes apart and the fibers become airborne.
Enoch said that the firefighters
who entered the building during the exercise wore self-contained breathing
apparatus. Those outside did not. The level of risk to them is still under
investigation, Enoch said.
The fire department always
tries to control risks in exercises.
"There's always concern,"
Enoch said. "That's why we have the asbestos removed from the structure."
However, firefighters don't
have that luxury when dealing with live emergencies. When a house goes
up in flames for real, firefighters face a range of dangers from the toxins
in smoke.
Enoch noted that a refrigerator
was also left in the structure during beginning of the burn. Although
it is not required by the Department of Safety Standards & Training regulations
used by the fire district, Enoch makes it a practice to have appliances
removed.
The refrigerator was overlooked.
"I was waiting for enough
people to move the refrigerator and it got missed," Enoch said.
He had his firefighters remove
the appliance after the first attack scenario was played out. The refrigerator
was not burned.
Some local residents were
upset that they were not informed in advance of the May 6 burn.
Enoch said that the building
was on a corner lot with lots of space around it, so his staff didn't
go door to door and alert the neighbors as they usually do.
"It's nice to notify the neighbors;
it's something we like to do," Enoch said. "We didn't this time."
The fire district has conducted
numerous burn-to-learn exercises this year.
|
|
||||||||