![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Building
boom raises doubts
Some folks in Sisters are having
second thoughts about the building boom sparked by the creation of smaller
city lots.
The city council and the planning
commission are debating whether the city should raise the minimum lot
size -- recently established at 6,000 square feet -- to alleviate the
"culture shock" of partitioned lots and duplexes built close together.
"A lot of people move to Central
Oregon or to Sisters because they like the culture and feel of elbow room,"
Mayor Steve Wilson said at a Thursday, May 23, workshop.
Residents bought property
in Sisters with spacious 10,000-square-foot or larger lots and now they
feel that the character of their neighborhoods is changing, Wilson said.
Many of those people have
contacted the mayor with concerns about the densification of their city.
But that densification has
its benefits, noted city planner Neil Thompson.
Smaller lot sizes make housing
more affordable -- and allows the spreading of "affordable housing" throughout
the community.
"Affordable housing, which
I associate with these smaller lot sizes, should never be ghettoized,"
Thompson said.
"You don't put all of your
affordable housing in one place."
Still, Thompson acknowledged,
new zoning rules do allow big changes in Sisters' density.
The planner noted that there
are some lots where there could be six housing units placed where only
one was allowed before.
Wilson worried whether developers
are simply "cashing in" on Sisters, maximizing their profits without concern
for the impact on neighbors.
Thompson said there is evidence
that much building is speculative. He said that the city has seen nearly
200 new housing units built in three years, yet the population has increased
by only 20.
City councilor John Rahm acknowledged
that changes can be hard on residents, but he argued that affordability
should carry as much weight as the culture of elbow room.
"I think there's competing
interests that have equal value," he said.
Increased density is not just
a cultural question.
According to city planners,
there are problems providing enough electricity to serve some of the partitioned
"in-fill" lots.
City planners consider that
a problem to be worked out between developers and Central Electric Co-op,
but the problem was presented as further evidence that greater density
might be inappropriate for Sisters.
The die may be cast, however.
The council and planners took
no action Thursday night and the building goes on apace.
Thompson noted that any change
in lot size would require advance notice to property owners who would
be affected.
Thompson acknowledged that
that could cause a rush to partition lots in advance of new zoning.
|
|
||||||