![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Letters,
letters, letters To the Editor:
I was very fascinated with Eric Dolson's editorial in the June 5 edition
of The Nugget titled, "Fund schools, not state cops.'
I found his rancorous assault on the Oregon State Police to be out of
touch with reality and based on erroneous assumptions about services provided
by the OSP and the topic of public safety in general.
Mr. Dolson claims that, "There is no correlation between the OSP patrols
and highway safety."
It is a fact that during the past several years, intoxicated drivers
have accounted for approximately 50 percent of all traffic fatalities
in the state of Oregon. In 2001, OSP patrol officers arrested and removed
5,389 intoxicated drivers from the highways.
If we are to believe Mr. Dolson, removing those drunks was unnecessary
and a waste of public expense since those arrests had no impact, whatsoever,
on making our highways safer. Think about that.
Mr. Dolson also states that the OSP, "has ceased to have a significant
function since cell phones connect nearly everyone on the highways."
If I understand him correctly, he is claiming that cell phones can effectively
replace OSP patrol officers. I have heard other ludicrous arguments favoring
termination of the OSP, but this cell phone argument is in a class all
its own.
If Mr. Dolson were to apply this same logic to public education, he should
be promoting the release of teachers rather than hiring new ones. Think
of the millions of public dollars that would be saved.
After all, with the information highway of the Internet, would it not
be more cost effective to replace our teachers with computers? If cell
phones can replace OSP troopers, why not have computers replace teachers?
The logic is the same.
Ralph L. Show
Editors Note: Mr. Show is a retired police officer, a 26-year veteran
of the Oregon State Police.
* * *
To the Editor:
After asbestos was found in a house which was burned during a "Burn to
Learn" exercise at 461 South Elm Street, we are now faced with some serious
questions in our community about regulations within the fire department
and the ability, in city planning, to allow burns to happen with a loose
association of a check and balance system that does not insure safety
both for firefighters and the public.
The owner of this little lot near the Village Green Park does not live
in Sisters. Ultimately, the responsibility of cleaning up the site is
hers. It is understood that she followed the legal steps in donating this
structure to the fire department by contracting the ECI (Environmental
Consulting and Investigation) to identify asbestos.
The Department of Environmental Quality fulfilled its role when they
tested the site and initiated an immediate clean-up of the harmful asbestos.
There was a pile of ashes that we know asbestos was in sitting on one
of Sisters' main streets during rodeo weekend when we have more people
walking around than usual.
Obviously the owner of the property is ineffective, living out of town,
but this happened in our town and it should be a more personal issue for
those of us living here.
Are people in harm's way after asbestos has been released into the air
locally? This question has yet to be addressed by anyone. If great precautions
are taken so as not to disturb asbestos or burn it then it would seem
that the ramifications could be severe and that follow up testing would
be necessary to determine the extent of contamination.
Where was the tape and the warning sign that should have gone up at the
site promptly after the discovery?
This situation occurred despite the precautions that were taken. Questions
were asked to the firefighters during the burn about the toxicity of the
synthetic materials inside (asbestos, drapes, couch, mattress, tar roof
shingles and fridge) and despite their reassurances they were wrong.
If we cannot depend on the developers who wish to donate these old structures
to gut them of toxic synthetics and the fire department to be more concerned
about burning them and notifying the public when they do, then eventually
this will happen again and public health will be compromised.
My suggestion is to ban these "Burn to Learn" exercises as Bend has done.
Sincerely,
Jeff McCaulou
* * *
To the Editor:
I was moved by your advocacy in the (June 5) issue of The Nugget.
I felt immediately anxious to get off my butt and start working for my
world in an educational and positive manner.
The bit about Royalty hit home. I disagreed with your sentiment about
the importance of the noble Princess Diana. She was a giver, and charismatic
-- a good combination. I believe you put her in a category of other such
dynasty who just host this-such-event or watch-planes-fly.
She performed remarkable conscious actions for the world, which were
altruistic and what all of us can and should do, always.
I agree that the drama in Royalty is overplayed. I believe each of us,
as individuals, are very valuable in our small community, our state, our
nation, our world, and that everyone can move mountains if they choose.
I want to briefly acknowledge your voice and move to better society.
Thank you!
Also, I would like to recognize three individuals I know have made a
difference, whether they know it or not: Heather Wester and her reason
and strength on the school board; Neil Walker and his overseas humanitarianism;
and Suzanna Ward and her endurance toward health and geriatric causes.
Not to mention all of the teachers and mentors out there in my life and
others, who constantly assist others to be proactive and valuable in this
world.
I advocate community service. I believe everyone has unique gifts to
give, if only to advance the indispensability of those around them. Be
your best!
Carrie Anne Ebner
* * *
To the Editor:
In reference to the article in The Nugget, June 5 issue about
SOAR ("SOAR named library's 'family'") I am shocked.
It is Barbara Turner who drives the children to the library once a week
to participate in the reading program. Tom Coffield has never accompanied
her.
While Mr. Coffield's administrative duties are important to the SOAR
program, it is the love and patience of people like Barbara that make
it a success.
It's Barbara who spends time with the kids either at SOAR or driving
them to school or taking the time to escort them to the library.
I would like for her to know her efforts have not gone unnoticed and
she is very much appreciated.
Thank you Barbara.
Dara Bettencourt
* * *
To the Editor:
On Monday evening, June 10, Sisters Middle School's humble multipurpose
room was transformed into a tropical paradise for our annual Eighth Grade
Dinner Dance.
Students were treated to a delicious dinner and a fun dance to celebrate
their promotion to high school.
We would like to thank the businesses and organizations who helped by
contributing.
We had many adult helpers, as well: Jade Schneringer, Lori Kallberg,
Patty and Jeff MacDonald, Deirdre and Charlie Kanzig, Karen Ellis, DeeDee
Burke, Teresa Slavkovsky, Chris Davenport, Terri Rood, Tracy Poynor, Karla
Barton, and Barb Haynes.
A special thanks to Mim Burke, who headed the parent organizing committee!
Sincerely,
Lora Nordquist, Principal
* * *
To the Editor:
We would like to thank the businesses and individuals who made the Sisters
Elementary School Fifth Grade Graduation a wonderful celebration for the
class of 2009.
Also, thanks to all the parents who gave their time and helped make this
a special event.
Tracy Tandy and Shelly Cristiano for the Fifth Grade Graduation Decorating
Committee |
|
||||||