![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here. ©
2002 |
Sisters
council says no to forest land swap The Sisters City
Council has weighed in against a proposed exchange of Squaw Creek lands
for property in the Steens Mountain Wilderness.
Landowner George Stroemple
pulled the controversial exchange proposal off the table the day before
the council meeting on Thursday, June 27.
However, the council decided
to take an official stand responding to strong public sentiment against
the exchange expressed at a public hearing on June 18 (see
"Residents speak out against land swap proposal," The Nugget,
June 26, page 1).
The council's non-binding
resolution not only opposed the Stroemple exchange; it also declared that
the lands in the "Squaw Creek Corridor" are "of vital interest to the
residents of the Sisters community" and that taking any of those lands
out of public hands would have a negative impact on Sisters' livability.
"The main concern was that
the public doesn't want public lands to go into private ownership," said
councilor Deb Kollodge. "That's the bottom line."
Councilor Lon Kellstrom cautioned
against taking a "we're against 'em all" approach to land exchanges, a
caution that other councilors accepted. However, they believe the council's
resolution was specific to the Squaw Creek corridor and conforms to the
city's stated policy that development should not grow toward the south.
Kellstrom also raised concerns
about the health of the forest in the area under Forest Service management.
He cited assertions that Stroemple might do a better job managing the
land.
"Do we let him clean it up
and prevent a fire in five years that wipes out the whole corridor?" Kellstrom
said. "It's a hard decision to make."
Stroemple had scaled back
the proposed swap, reducing the Squaw Creek acreage he seeks from 690
acres to 462 acres. Stroemple owns 1,240 acres of in-holding in the Steens
Mountain Wilderness that the federal government and many environmentalists
want brought into the wilderness.
Though he withdrew the proposal,
his letter asked the council to "take a careful look at the revised offer...
I would propose using this approach as a starting point for future discussions."
Stroemple also asked "those
concerned with the exchange to look at the conservation easements we have
offered, because they are permanent easements that will be held by the
Forest Service and will apply not only to me but to all future owners
of the land. They cannot be cancelled or revoked."
Mayor Steve Wilson said that
Stroemple's land use consultant Andy Wiessner of Western Lands Group,
a Colorado firm, had contacted him and urged the council not to make a
formal statement on the proposal.
But Wilson and his fellow
councilors argued that the council had an obligation to respond to public
input and make a stand.
"At some point we need to
put an end to the 'let's make a deal' process and state our philosophical
position," Wilson said. |
|
||||||