![]()
|
||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Earthquake
effects apparently not unique to Blue Lake Two weeks ago,
a Caldera poet witnessed sudden waves and turbulence at Blue Lake. (The
Nugget,
November 6, 2002)
As it turns out, the phenomenon
observed by Gwen Morgan was seen in other areas around the country.
Forest Service geologist Larry
Chitwood said that the major earthquake in Alaska triggered waves in lakes
as far away as Louisiana, where water disturbances were generated in Lake
Pontchartrain.
"There's a pretty good case
that the wave actions observed at Blue Lake were probably induced by the
big Denali earthquake," Chitwood said. "There were reports coming in from
all over the contiguous 48 states that were triggered by that quake."
He said that waves were recorded
in the Great Lakes and "at Lake Union in Seattle, boats were banged together
and damaged."
Chitwood doubted that the
phenomena observed were the result of anything other than direct transmission
of seismic waves.
He noted that seismographs
throughout the Northwest registered the event, but the top of the wave's
signature was "clipped" at most sites because the temblor exceeded the
sensitivity settings of most units.
One exception, however, was
the seismograph at the Mt. St. Helens dome.
"The one at the dome was turned
down because there are so many rock falls there that they saturate the
seismograph," Chitwood said.
"Since it was turned down,
there was not any clipping. It showed beautiful waves."
Chitwood explained that the
first wave through is the P-wave, or primary wave.
"It's very noisy," he said,
"and the one you actually hear. Seven minutes later, the S-wave (sheer
wave) was really noticeable and came through in big pulses. That's the
wave that causes damage, because it causes the ground to move sideways.
"The waves came at six cycles
per minute," he said. "Almost all of its energy produced back and forth
motions that required 10 seconds to complete each swing.
"That has quite an effect
on lakes. It's like taking a bowl full of water and moving it back and
forth."
Chitwood suspects that all
lakes within reach of the tremor responded in some way to the release
of energy. He could not say for certain why the effects at Blue Lake were
so noticeable.
One important factor, he said,
is that someone was in such a good position to directly observe at the
time of the incident.
Chitwood consulted other geologists
about the Blue Lake observations and all agreed that the most interesting
aspect of the incident was the fact that the lake level was suddenly raised
and remained at the higher level for some period of time.
"That's pretty remarkable,"
he said, explaining that the shaking during an earthquake causes underlying
layers of sand and gravel to "densify."
Deposits at the bottom of
a lake have interstitial spaces filled with air and water.
"When that (densification)
happens," Chitwood said, "the water has to go somewhere. It's just water
trying to get out of the ground when sand and gravel settle."
As a result, he said, water
levels can be temporarily raised.
In this case, however, the
water level remained a couple of feet above what it had been.
Blue Lake resident Gary Lovegren
said that after three days, he went to the dam to lower the level because
he was worried about the possibility of damage from the high water.
"It's never been that high
before," Lovegren said.
Scientists from the Cascade
volcano project expressed interest in the Blue Lake observations and may
seek to develop additional information. At this point, however, Chitwood
says that there is very little chance that the incident is related to
any local volcanic or seismic activity. |
|
||||||