![]()
|
|||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Local
social services being cut The bewildering
array of social services that receive at least some government support in
Oregon is composed of two large groups today -- the lucky and the unlucky.
The lucky are the ones that
depend primarily on federal, local or private funding. The unlucky are
those that depend heavily on the state general fund, the main operating
fund of state government.
With the failure of Measure
28, the state general fund is expected to fall about 20 percent short
of the revenue expected when the Legislature adopted the 2001-2003 budget.
As revenue projections have been revised downward throughout the biennium,
the Legislature and government managers have ordered cuts to fit the lower
income.
Some of those cuts will be
felt in Central Oregon.
A giant administrative operation,
the Department of Human Services, runs most of the social service programs
in which state government is involved.
Patrick Carey oversees all
DHS operations in the three counties of Central Oregon. The department
overall has been ordered to take a 20 percent general fund reduction in
the current fiscal year.
"But child welfare gets about
25 percent of its support from the general fund whereas senior programs
were up to about 60 percent," Carey said. The result is that a 20 percent
cut "takes a much bigger bite out of senior programs than the others."
Dennis Conley works under
Carey as the manager of services for seniors and the disabled in the tri-county
area. He said about 470 of his office's clients have lost eligibility
for a variety of services. About half the number had been receiving help
with the cost of prescription drugs. The other half need various forms
of direct assistance, from grocery shopping to bathing and toileting.
Conley, who is based in Bend,
works closely with Carol Bro in Redmond, executive director of the Central
Oregon Council on Aging.
Her private, nonprofit agency
relies heavily on government funds. It either provides directly or contracts
for many of the same kinds of services as Carey's agency. But its clientele
is a bit higher on the income scale.
All of Carey's clients are
eligible for Medicaid, federal health insurance for low-income citizens.
In Oregon, that means they qualify for the Oregon Health Plan. Bro's operation
provides such familiar services as Meals on Wheels and Dial-A-Ride. It
had been providing in-home care to about 100 clients in the three counties,
but has cut 40 off the list because of budget cuts.
Both the DHS and COCOA evaluate
their clients' needs on a scale of dependency, with Level 18 being the
highest (most independent). Cuts have been made in help for those in Levels
15 through 18 so far. Now, with the failure of Measure 28, cuts will soon
be made in help for those in Levels 10 through 14.
The overall strategy, all
of the managers explained, is to try to do the least harm to individuals
with the greatest need for outside help in basic functions of living.
"I can tell you this is probably
the worst year that we have ever seen in aging programs," Bro said. "We
have been through lots of recessions but nothing of this magnitude."
Other local impacts include:
|
|
|||||||