![]()
|
|||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Letters,
letters, letters To the Editor:
Your January
29 front page depicts me as "complaining about the appearance of homes
in Sisters."
That is incorrect. The material I read at the council meeting and pictures I presented were about how "infilling" with duplexes in single-family neighborhoods has proven wrong and disrupting. Several planning findings in other cities were in a handout that showed that the basic fabric and stability of the neighborhood is compromised when rental duplexes are added to single-family areas. "Where new infill development is proposed it should be entirely consistent and compatible with pre-existing developments." This means putting duplexes in amongst already established single-family neighborhoods flies in the face of responsible planning. Placing duplexes in
single-family areas may fit a code but something is wrong with the code.
Mr. Forbes said it can be done right -- I agree -- but not in established
single-family neighborhoods.
Duplexes should not be used as "infill." I did provide pictures of two beautiful and tidy bungalows on East
Jefferson. They do not deserve higher density rental units next door. Single
residential homes that are rented is a far different matter than duplex rentals in established neighborhoods. Mel Bryan |
|
|||||||