![]()
|
|||||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Fish
die as Squaw Creek runs dry
About a mile-long
stretch of Squaw Creek went dry last week when competing irrigation interests
siphoned off the entire stream flow. Like the recent lunar eclipse, water
officials say that a series of events had to line up just right -- or wrong
-- to cause the incident.
According to Assistant Watermaster
Ed Lavelle, "miscommunication" between the Squaw Creek Irrigation District
and the Sokol ranch led to the mishap, which killed some 200 or more fish.
Lavelle emphasized that both
diversions are legal uses of the water, but the users are generally able
to coordinate the water use to prevent such a mistake.
"It was reported Monday morning
by a hiker," Lavelle said. "We weren't aware that that section of the
creek was fully dewatered. We did a quick survey and released an extra
5 cfs (cubic feet per second) to water the dry section."
Lavelle explained that a monitoring
system keeps tabs on the water flow through Sisters, but the dry spot
developed farther upstream. Normally, he said, the monitoring station
would have picked up the problem, but water was being passed through from
Pole Creek.
The watermaster's office said
that Pole Creek, a tributary of Squaw Creek, is normally fully committed
to irrigation this time of year. However, on this occasion, enough of
the Pole Creek water was making it through to register on the Sisters
water monitor. Since Pole Creek enters Squaw Creek between the Sokol diversion
and Sisters, the interrupted flow upstream was not detected by the equipment.
The end result was no water
between the Sokol's ranch and Pole Creek.
Marc Thalacker, of the Squaw
Creek Irrigation District, indicated that SCID was caught a little off
guard by Pole Creek's augmentation of the water monitor's readings. He
added that additional water was released into Squaw Creek as soon as the
problem was discovered.
"Right now," Thalacker said,
"we're working extremely hard to make sure that the downstream and instream
water rights are protected, as well as the irrigation district's water
rights."
Thalacker confirmed that allocated
water rights exceed Squaw Creek's current water production.
"For the last couple of weeks,
we've only been diverting 40 cfs and we have rights to 150 cfs," he said.
"So, what we do is divvy that up on a percentage basis. Last week we were
delivering about 30 percent; but in this heat, it'll increase."
Forest Service fishery biologist
Mike Riehle felt that the incident should have been preventable.
"I think it's something that
happens in the spring fairly often," he said, "but as long as it doesn't
go completely dry, it stays cold enough that the fish can survive."
Riehle explained that warm
spring days and cold nights result in a very irregular water flow in Squaw
Creek this time of year. "When the snow melts, it takes about 12 hours
for that water to get to town," he said, "so it fluctuates on a daily
basis and goes through a cycle each day. This year, the situation is exacerbated
by the low snow pack.
"This low flow period isn't
unusual," Riehle said. "Some years it may get critical and kill some of
the fish. I don't think it has such a severe effect later in the summer
when the snowmelt is more consistent."
Riehle said he counted nearly
200 dead fish, but the number was surely greater since his survey was
limited by the fact that water was already flowing again when he was on
scene.
Most of the fish fatalities
he observed were sculpins and long-nosed dace, a native minnow that grows
to about five inches in length. He said that both species are "good forage
for fish-eating fish."
A smaller number of redband
(rainbow) trout also died.
The redband is a federally
classified "sensitive species" that is judged to be dwindling; but the
listing stops short of "endangered" status.
"It's important for the irrigators
to manage the water and coordinate when they are taking water out," Riehle
said. "It also puts more emphasis on water conservation efforts and to
getting more in-stream water flow to act as a buffer when things break
down. There's not a lot of room for error."
Lavelle conceded that the
recently acquired 1.81 cfs water right for Squaw Creek through Sisters
does not cover the stretch impacted in last week's event. That water right
came from another diversion which is closer to town, so a more reliable
flow still depends on conservation or acquisition of additional rights.
The Upper Deschutes Watershed
Council and various public and private agencies are working to secure
increased, permanent water flow rights for Squaw Creek.
A stable flow of water is
considered essential for long-term rehabilitation leading to a healthy
stream system, which some hope might one day lead to the restoration of
salmon and steelhead runs through Sisters.
Thalacker was optimistic that
the completed and future water conservation projects, in the form of irrigation
ditch piping, would free up about 10.5 cfs to contribute to the Squaw
Creek stream flow.
In the meantime, Lavelle said,
"We're hoping to develop a little better communication among the users,
so this kind of thing won't happen in the future." |
|
|||||||||