![]()
|
|||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Letters,
letters, letters To the Editor:
Allow me to start by thanking the Buckmanns for their initiative and
the hard work that has gone into the flag project. I, too, am proud of
the result and its reflection on the town. I had a flag made in honor
of my father, who was a World War II Commander. I was pleased to find
it flying on the corner in front of The Gallimaufry, a business establishment
he would have particularly appreciated.
That the city administrator's comments to The Nugget on this
matter were referred to by last week's letter writer as "pathetic" should
in no way reflect on her as she was simply trying to expound the council's
position. That's her job.
I was the city councilor who initially expressed concern about the proposal
to fly the flags continually and I'll attempt to clarify my concerns.
I do not speak for the council...my colleagues have their own opinions.
I believe that flying the flags continually is indiscriminate and that
the meaning and significance of the display is thereby diluted. When flown
continually the flags are noticed less and less, even taken for granted.
In the end they become merely another decoration for the town and as such
an affront to flag etiquette.
I would define patriotism as devotion to the welfare of one's country
(Webster's). For those who condescend to imply that flag flying is some
sort of litmus test of one's patriotism, may I suggest that voting, writing
your representatives, volunteering, working to stay informed in a complex
world, keeping an open mind, supporting favorite causes and even participating
in a public forum such as this are all better indicators.
Patriotic citizenship is hard work. Just flying the flag does not make
this a better world.
Let's fly them when we can all agree on what they mean, celebrating our
independence and our veterans and our lost warriors and so on and take
them down in between.
Absence makes the heart grow fonder.
John Rahm
* * *
To the Editor:
I am confident that Mr. Doug Wood and I will continue to disagree on
whether or not his solution to the state of Indian affairs is ethical
-- and as that is merely a matter of opinion, I will leave it alone (Letters
to the Editor, The Nugget, July 30).
However, I assume that Mr. Wood believes that his proposal is plausible,
and on such a discussion of fact, I am happy to weigh in. Mr. Wood writes,
"If we were to cling to bad policy as Ms. Shaw suggests there would have
been no Emancipation Proclamation authored by Lincoln. If we are to keep
our word then PERS should continue with a guaranteed 8 percent annual
growth. Changing bad policy is how we make progress."
While they might have been conceived by federal policy, fortunately treaties
are a matter of legal agreement, not policy.
Treaties, unlike the two examples, are legally binding contracts between
two sovereign nations. I know of only two ways to affect such a contract:
renegotiating it or violating it.
The first was tried by the United States in the 1940s, '50s, and '60s.
Our neighbors, the Klamath Indians, are victims of the government's misguided
Termination Policy. A quick look at the history of that situation would
illustrate that the outcome for the Klamath Indians was not as rosy as
Mr. Wood would like to project for Indians should the government only
stop feeding that "unethical relationship."
Another option, I suppose, would be to ignore contracts in the name of
"better" policy. However, if I sold my car to someone and he chose not
to keep his end of the bargain, the law says that I may repossess my property.
The original article that spurred this discussion was about Olivia Wallulatum
of the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs. Before we advocate breaching
treaties, we would do well to remember what the Tribes of Warm Springs
gave the U.S. in exchange for what Mr. Wood calls "ethnic pandering, birthright
stipends, and gambling concessions": Ten million acres of the most beautiful
country in Oregon.
Shawnele Shaw
* * *
To the Editor:
Running is our passion and our local business community has helped us
to continue this important pursuit! Cross-country running is a non-funded
Sisters High School sport, so we earn money annually to cover transportation,
uniform, and coaching costs.
Our team would like to thank the businesses who made generous contributions
to our breakfast and lunch fund-raiser held on Quilt Day; without their
support we could not have conducted the event.
Sincerely,
Rikki Glick and Justin Thomas |
|
|||||||