![]()
|
|||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
Death
of sheriff's proposal disappoints city officials Sisters
city officials are disappointed with the Deschutes County Board of Commissioners
3-0 vote to deny support of a permanent tax district for sheriff's office
services. The vote was taken Wednesday, November 12.
Instead of putting a permanent
tax system on the ballot in May, the commissioners will support a five-year,
temporary property tax levy.
Sheriff Les Stiles told the
Sisters City Council last month the history of two- to three-year levies
must stop, because he is losing hard-working deputies who leave for jobs
which promise them long-term income stability.
"I think the sheriff needs
to be running his department, instead of campaigning every few years for
a levy," said Councilor Deb Kollodge.
Commissioner Tom DeWolf said
in a press release that the proposed rates for urban taxpayers were too
high for the permanent funding.
"Though permanent funding
is my first choice, we lack agreement on the appropriate rates to charge
urban versus rural taxpayers," DeWolf said. "I will not place a permanent
tax measure on the ballot which will double the tax rate for rural residents.
It is doomed to failure and would jeopardize public safety in Deschutes
County."
Stiles said the department
needs the tax revenue to maintain its operating costs. Stiles said the
department cut $2.2 million in expenditures this year, which meant getting
rid of a 90-bed work release center and 25 department jobs.
"The bottom line is they have
been cutting public safety for the last three years and it looks like
they will continue to cut it," Stiles said.
If the permanent tax district
had been passed, rural taxpayers would pay a maximum of $2.04. That rate
would be a significant increase from the rural residents' current rate
of $1.12 per $1,000 of assessed value.
The urban rates (inside the
city limits), would have dropped to 68 cents per $1,000 assessed value
from 78 cents per $1,000 assessed value, Stiles said.
Sisters City Councilor John
Rahm pointed out that Stiles' numbers reflect the highest amount the rural
taxpayers could pay over 10 years, not necessarily the amount they would
pay each year.
"I'm in favor of the permanent
tax district, though it looked to me like it would be a challenge to convince
the (rural) voters to go for it," Rahm said. "I think the way they write
up on the ballot the maximum in 10 years, the number is high enough to
intimidate everyone."
Councilor Deb Kollodge said
in an email that it is the city residents, not the rural residents, who
are paying more taxes than they should. She pointed out that 80 percent
of the city's property taxes go to fund municipal police protection.
"In Sisters 80 percent ($311,705)
of our tax revenues ($385,640 for 2003-04) go to pay for contracted sheriff
services," Kollodge said. "That means that $2.11 of the $2.64 per thousand
of assessed value collected pays for police protection within the Sisters
City Limits.
"Plus the city residents pay
78 cents per $1,000 for sheriff's levy. So someone living within the City
of Sisters that owns a $200,000 home pays $2.89 ($2.11+$.78) per $1,000
or $578 a year for police protection (not counting the jail bond)," she
said.
Eileen Stein, city administrator,
said the city's $2.89 per thousand also helps fund the sheriff's patrolling
of rural areas.
DeWolf said in a press release,
that sometimes city residents will pay for services outside their jurisdiction,
but rural residents contribute in other ways.
"People who live outside cities
shop at Bi-Mart, Fred Meyer, Costco, Safeway and Staples in Bend," DeWolf
said. "They eat at restaurants in Sisters and Sunriver. They go to the
movies in Redmond. They golf in Black Butte. They help provide the income
with which those businesses pay their property taxes to support their
urban police services.
"I've seen no calculations
of how much rural residents are supporting police services in the cities
through their purchases. People in Bend eat at Tumalo Feed Company and
golf in La Pine. Their money helps pay property taxes for rural patrols,
but a fraction by comparison because the vast majority of business is
concentrated within urban centers."
The sheriff's permanent tax
plan would raise the current rural tax of $168 for the owner of a $150,000
home to about $300.
Councilor John Rahm said urban
residents need to pay more because they have not been paying as much as
the city for sheriff's services.
"Theirs might be doubling,
but the thing is, they're not paying their share," Rahm said. "It's a
hard pill to swallow, but you have to look at it like they have been paying
half the price." |
|
|||||||