![]()
|
|||||||||
|
The on-line Nugget does not feature all the stories of our print edition. For all the news, subscribe here.
©
2002 Display
Advertising The
contents of the on-line edition of The Nugget represent a selection
among the stories that appear in the weekly print edition. |
New
parking idea being considered An innovative
parking method, which is popular in Europe, could make an appearance in
Sisters along with a proposed Hood Avenue/Main Avenue couplet.
The parking method would require
drivers to back in to angled parking spaces along the two proposed one-way
highways.
Jean Wells Keenan, owner of
The Stitchin' Post, said backing in to a parking space is less intimidating
than the standard backing out onto busy streets.
Keenan said she has to reverse
out of parking lots in downtown Bend and feels it creates a traffic hazard.
She said she favors the reverse-in parking or parallel parking.
Keenan met with the couplet
advisory committee last week in its second meeting to discuss plans to
create a couplet with a one-way eastbound Hood Avenue arm and a westbound
Main Avenue arm. The committee will make recommendations for the design
of the couplet to Sisters City Council and the Oregon Department of Transportation
after its final monthly meeting in May.
The couplet is intended to
relieve traffic congestion on Cascade Avenue during peak periods. If ODOT
funds the estimated $2 million couplet, it is slated to be complete in
2010.
The committee discussed many
criteria for the design and safety of the couplet, including the need
to implement parking along both of the proposed 25 mile-per-hour highways.
Eric Graves, a consultant
from Cogan Owens Cogan, introduced the committee to the new reverse-in
angle parking option. He said it is a new parking design, which is popular
in Europe and used in Seattle and on an experimental block in Portland.
He said angled parking conserves
space and can provide more parking spaces than parallel parking.
He said in an email to The
Nugget that the reverse-in angled parking would be safer than front-in
angled parking because the "backing maneuver required to exit the parking
stall often requires drivers to blindly back into the travel lane. This
is a safety hazard to other motorists on the street, but especially dangerous
to bicyclists who are generally less visible.
"Reverse-in angled parking
provides much better visibility for parked vehicles entering the traffic
flow."
Implementing such a new parking
method, however, could confuse drivers if they are not well-informed of
the design, Graves said. He said such parking has caused confusion in
other cities.
"People don't know what to
do with it," Graves said. "They make U-turns and end up facing the wrong
way. We would need to educate the public and have signs."
Graves said he would do more
research on reverse-in angle parking and present the data to the committee
at its January meeting. |
|
|||||||