Nugget Newspaper - Sisters, Oregon News, Events, Classifieds | Sisters, Oregon Nugget Sponsorship



HOMENEWSOPINIONCLASSIFIEDSCouponsCALENDARObituariesROAD REPORTVideo Library
Latest Sisters, Oregon, weather
Current News
Education
Business
Sports & Recreation
Health
Home & Garden
Columns
Obituaries
Announcements
Area Events
Calendar
Arts & Entertainment
Archive
OPINION
Editorial
Letters
Contact List
Advertising
Camp Sherman
City of Sisters
Deschutes County
Public Library
Sisters Guide
Sisters Chamber
Sisters Map
Sisters Schools
SPRD




Advanced Search

home : opinions : opinions June 18, 2018


4/17/2018 1:36:00 PM
The devil's details of firearms regulation
By Steve Nugent


Since the Florida high school shooting, there have been many gun-control proposals and even state legislation passed, at least in Florida. I am truly encouraged by the actions of so many high school students across this country and their growing influence.

The thing that concerns me about proposals to ban or restrict so called "assault weapons" and "high-capacity magazines" is that these terms are not explicitly defined. I am concerned that gun legislation, by using these terms, is risking the exclusion of many equally lethal weapons.

What needs to happen is a determination of exactly what capabilities and characteristics make certain long guns particularly deadly, compared to a typical rifle used for hunting. By deadly, I mean chances of survival if humans are shot, chances of taking the gunman down before mass carnage takes place, and capability to kill from long distances and at high rates. If one analyzes the lethality of all long guns based on these criteria, several specific attributes that make some guns more lethal than others become obvious:

• Semi-automatic or automatic actions in rifles, combined with high-caliber ammo.

• Removable magazines, on-the-fly.

• High-capacity magazines.

• Folding or removable stocks or fully plastic construction.

• Certain types of ammunition, such as armor-piercing, fragmenting, explosive, etc.

I would argue that none of these five attributes are necessary for hunting or sport target-shooting. If a hunter needs to pepper a deer in order to kill it, he should not be hunting. For those who live in fear and paranoia from some threat from the U.S. government and have amassed caches of weapons and ammunition: give it up. The U.S. military has you outnumbered, out-gunned and out-trained. This is why we have a good Constitution and the rule of law in this country.

These five long-gun characteristics must be banned, instead of some weak definition of an assault rifle. An important thing to point out is that many rifles that are not technically "assault weapons" are still semi-automatic and can accommodate removable and sometimes high-capacity magazines. Folding stocks and fully plastic construction can allow weapons to be brought into buildings and venues undetected.

My point is that simply focusing on banning or regulation of "assault weapons" and "high-capacity magazines" is insufficient and leaves too many loopholes open. Anyone with a will to do carnage will still find a suitable tool for that unless these loopholes are closed. Gun manufacturers will still make semi-automatic rifles with removable magazines that can do the same thing as an AR-15, they just won't look like an AR-15.

In order to significantly reduce the incidents of mass-killings in the U.S., we need intelligent, common-sense gun reform. I propose that the following attributes in long-guns be outlawed:

• All semi-automatic rifles, except for .22 caliber.

• Removable magazines on ANY rifle, except for .22 caliber.

• Folding or removable stock on ANY rifle.

• Fully plastic or mostly plastic construction of any rifle or handgun.

I believe the federal government has a duty to outlaw long guns with these attributes and buy back all weapons with these attributes from legal owners. This should be done anonymously, so no gun owner is recorded. No driver's license should be shown etc., just exchange the gun for money. I believe this would actually make a difference in our children's and our own safety, and it would not threaten our Second Amendment rights.









Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   















Life
© Copyright 2018. All rights reserved. The Nugget Newspaper, LLC
PO Box 698 • 442 E. Main Ave., Sisters, Oregon 97759 • 541-549-9941 office • 541-549-9940 Fax

Life



Software © 1998-2018 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved