News and Opinion from Sisters, Oregon

Letters to the Editor

A heartfelt thank you and goodbye to Jim and Sue Anderson. Folks and critters of Sisters Country are going to miss you, something fierce.

Judy Bull


To the Editor:

I read the column that Jim Anderson is moving. Tears began to stream as I have so enjoyed reading Jim’s articles about our beautiful wildlife, his wonderful family, and our precious world. I want to thank Jim for his life’s work and all he has brought to us. The education, beautiful prose, and wonderful insight. I will miss your sage wisdom and wish you the very best. You have made my world a better place and I thank you from the bottom of my heart!

May good health, peace and beauty be yours.

Rebecca French


To the Editor:

Once in a great while you are given the pleasure of meeting someone who is more unique and kinder than nearly everyone else you know. Nearly 30 years ago I had the pleasure of meeting Jim Anderson. He spoke at a meeting of the Friends of Black Butte Ranch. His knowledge of the natural world into which we had moved was astounding. But it was his humor that really captivated me. Over time we became friends. Our most recent adventure was live-trapping a skunk who had been terrorizing my neighborhood. He told me to bait the trap with Ray’s roasted chicken. It worked. Others had been trying to trap this skunk but it was Jim’s method that succeeded.

If you like nature and love humor you need to read Jim’s wonderful book, “Tales from a Northwest Naturalist.” Many people are good writers, very few know how to write with humor. Jim’s an expert. We will all miss him.

Jean Nave


To the Editor:

I am writing in response to the letter written by Owen Herzberg published August 26. Every Saturday morning I attend a peaceful protest in Sisters to express my opposition to racial injustice in our country. I attend because I am sickened that an unarmed Black man can be shot seven times in the back, in front of his children, in broad daylight, with no apparent consequence to the shooter, a policeman who has sworn to serve and protect his fellow citizens.

I attend because I am outraged that deliberate and systemic racism has created huge disparities for People of Color in many success indicators including wealth, the criminal justice system, employment, housing, health care, politics and education.

I attend because Black lives matter. That is not a political statement; it is a statement of belief. My belief. I am not a member of any organized, anti-racist group. I do not follow the directions nor endorse the beliefs of any so-called “leaders” of any organization. It is not my intent to “disrupt communities, families and social norms.”

I am not a Marxist, nor do I endorse anarchy. I am just a well-informed citizen who wants to live in a country where each and every individual is equal under the law, regardless of skin color, country of origin, sexual orientation, zip code, religious belief, gender or political affiliation.

I want to live in a country where each and every citizen is afforded equal opportunities to succeed and prosper. I want to live in a country where violence is not tolerated and perpetrators of violence are held accountable. This is why I wave my BLM sign every Saturday morning. Why is this so hard for you to understand? What, exactly, are you afraid of? What kind of America do you want to live in?

Janet Keen

s s s

To the Editor:

On Saturday, August 29, we had our 14th consecutive weekly rally at the corner of Cascade Avenue and Larch Street in support of Black Lives Matter. While most of the responses we elicit are positive and respectful, the opposition usually boils down to two arguments:

1. “All Lives Matter.” This is a true statement, but all lives do not and cannot matter until Black Lives Matter. One month after the murder of George Floyd – 8 minutes and 46 seconds of horror while a defenseless and unarmed Black man was slowly strangled to death by a Minneapolis policeman — we held a vigil to memorialize not just Floyd but the deaths of 96 other victims of white supremacy over the past 10 years.

The fact that there were so many names (and I’m sure we didn’t find them all) speaks for itself. After the video documenting the slow murder of Floyd, can anyone now ignore the reality that Black people are endangered because of the color of their skin? We want to see “all lives matter” become a reality but that can only happen when Black Lives Matter. And that can only happen when we recognize and address the racism that causes Black lives to be de-valued.

2. “BLM is a Marxist movement with a Marxist agenda.” This argument seeks to tarnish a diffuse movement that shares the slogan “Black Lives Matter” with legal entities within the movement, one of whose founders has identified herself as a Marxist. For nearly everyone who has expressed support for Black Lives Matter (including Republican Senators Mike Braun and Mitt Romney), the slogan Black Lives Matter signifies opposition to the violence with which George Floyd and other Black people have been treated — to the deaths and injuries that Black people are subjected to because of the color of their skin.

I personally am well-acquainted with Marxism. I studied it in school and spent considerable time in the former Soviet Union. I am not a Marxist. I do not support anarchy. I oppose violence. I am a retired lawyer who was in private practice, who worked as in-house counsel at U.S. Bank, and who served as general counsel for two international charities. I am a wife and a mother. I support Black Lives Matter because until they do, all lives cannot matter.

Mary Chaffin


To the Editor:

Driving through Sisters this weekend on beautiful summer evenings, I was appalled to see the crowds gathered outside bars and restaurants.

Of course, you can’t eat or drink with a mask on. It is the large numbers of people in close proximity to one another that was disturbing. Also, some of our businesses are not enforcing the wearing of masks in their establishments. It is easy to say we live in a small town with only a few reported cases and we don’t need to be inconvenienced by having to follow state guidelines like the larger cities.

This is why we continue to see the spread of the virus.

Inconvenienced by wearing a mask? Uncomfortable? Can’t breathe as well? I saw real inconvenience first hand recently in one of our hospitals. Front-line workers are taking so many steps to keep patients safe. Wearing PPEs, using hand sanitizer before entering the room, after entering the room, before leaving the room and then outside the room, before continuing on to the next task. By not doing what we know helps prevent COVID-19, we are contributing to the spread of this virus.

Sisters has so many out-of-town and out-of-state visitors, we do not know where the virus may be lurking. Please, we all want to be able to return to a life that allows us to move about. Doing simple things to prevent more cases is essential.

Debbie Barnes


To the Editor:

I want to thank Commissioner Henderson for his August 12 letter to the editor stating that if the Deschutes National Forest needs more funding to reduce hazardous fuels he will advocate for it. The time for that advocacy is now, and yesterday.

In 2009 a group of environmentalists, timber industry representatives, fire fighters, the Forest Service, and other community partners secured $10.1 million in a national competition to implement forest restoration and fuels reduction work across 257,000 acres of forest stretching from Black Butte Ranch to Sunriver, wrapping around the cities of Sisters and Bend. I was one of three authors for the proposal, so I am intimately familiar with the package of work that became the Deschutes Collaborative Forest Project.

Between 2009 and 2019, those $10.1 million allowed the Deschutes National Forest to complete over 120,000 acres of thinning, mowing, and prescribed fire treatments. Some of those treated acres became key anchor points where fire fighters were able to stop the Pole Creek and Milli fires from advancing into Sisters area subdivisions. Those fires clearly demonstrated that fuels reduction work helps us contain fires, reduce their severity, and protect our homes. This restoration work also employed over 100 members of our community over that 10-year period.

The 10 -year $10.1 million award expired in 2019 and there are still 30,000 acres within the 257,000-acre landscape at high or extreme risk of wildfire.

The Deschutes Collaborative and the Forest Service have sought an extension of their 10-year award and got a positive review from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program advisory committee.

Unfortunately, the advisory committee gave positive reviews to a total of $70.3 million of projects nationally for 2021 and Congress has only appropriated $40 million for the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program in recent years.

Congress will need to be prodded to increase Appropriations for this program which could provide sorely needed wildfire protection, habitat improvement, and employment for our community.

Despite holding a seat on the Steering Committee of the Deschutes Collaborative, Commissioner Henderson does not appear to have listened well enough to understand the need to advocate for these appropriations to protect his constituents from wildfire. County Commissioners can have a lot of influence on forest management and funding when they know what to ask for. I ask for your vote and pledge to do better for our community and our forests.

Phil Chang


Reader Comments(0)

Rendered 06/18/2024 11:31